Speech by Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mr Aziz Pahad
at the South African Institute of International Affairs - Western Cape Branch
February 2007, South Africa in the UN Security Council
As all of us know, South Africa was overwhelmingly endorsed
by the international community to serve on the Security Council from 2007 to 2008.
We have just finished one month of our participation. I must thank the Western
Cape Branch of SAIIA for inviting me to speak to you today on South Africa's participation
in the UN Security Council.
South Africa's role in the SC has to be seen
in the context of our overall foreign policy objectives. Since our democratic
changes in 1994, our foreign policy has been driven by the strategic objective
of creating "a better SA, a better Africa and a better world", we seek
to achieve these objectives in a fundamentally changed international relations
environment which is, inter alia, characterised by the end of the Cold War and
the emergence of a super power with unparalled economic, military and cultural
As the world, including SA, sought to grapple with the impact
of these developments on international relations we were confronted by the terrorist
attack against targets in the USA on 9/11, 2002. These attacks had a further profound
impact on international relations:
· In the wake of 9/11, the USA
national strategic document (2003) - gave warning that the USA will use it's political,
economic and military strength to fight any challenge to its hegemony. Also that
it will act unilaterally against any terrorist organisation, against any state
that harbours terrorist organisations and against any individuals that they declare
to be assisting terrorism.
We have entered the period of preventative action,
and conceptions such as -
- "axis of evil"
- "clash of civilisations"
- Islamic fascism
drives the foreign policy perspectives
of many powerful countries.
Some characteristics of the international environment
- weakening of multilateralism
- no common vision
of global security
- disregard of the UN Charter and international law
rejection of international protocols
- unparalled anti-americanism and the
consequent rise of terrorism, and a militaristic approach to fighting terrorism
is in this very volatile, dangerous and unpredictable environment that democratic
SA has sought to carry out our foreign policy objectives.
We have identified
3 main challenges:
1. Eradicating poverty and achieving sustainable economic
growth and improving the quality of lives of peoples in SA, Africa and the world.
In this context we have to deal with:
1.1 Globalisation and the marginalisation
and growing impoverisation of
many countries of the south, especially sub-saharan
Africa, and the growing reality that many of these countries will not achieve
the UN's MDGs target for 2015
1.2 Africa's response to globalisation
1.2.2 Institutional changes
1.2.3 Transformation from OAU to AU
Improving the institutional capacity of the AU
1.3.2 New Asia-Africa strategic partnership
1.3.6 Growing economic power of China and
1.4 Economic Diplomacy has become a major aspect of our international
work, this, inter alia, demands that we seek to get:
- Foreign Direct
- Market opportunities
As we strengthen our South-south Cooperation we must seek to
intensify North-South Cooperation. However, even in the interests of the North
it is essential that such cooperation is mutually advantageous.
2. The second
major challenge we have identified is peace and security. We believe that there
can be no development without security, no security without development and no
democracy, human rights, good governance without security and development.
this context, inter alia, we deal with conflicts in:
DRC; Burundi; Somalia;
Sudan; Cote d'Ivoire; Ethiopia and Western Sahara;
Middle East - Palestine
- Israel - Lebanon;
West Africa - Afganistan - Iran - Iraq;
We also have to deal with the Proliferation of weapons of mass destruction
- North Korea
Other priority issues are:
International criminal and drug syndicates
- Climate change
3. The third
challenge we have identified is the fundamental transformation of global governance,
political and economical:
The founding fathers of the United Nations identified
a set of fundamental Purposes and Principles, I quote
to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime
has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and
· to reaffirm faith in fundamental
human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights
of men and women and of nations large and small, and
· to establish
conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties
and other sources of international law can be maintained, and to promote social
progress and better standards of life in larger freedom "
exactly the enduring values and principles for which South Africa stands. They
are enshrined in our Constitution. Our membership and participation within the
United Nations is therefore premised on reaffirming our critical support for the
work of the UN system as a whole. Mindful of course of the current global context,
of the pressing need to enhance the authority and efficiency of the UN, as well
as its capacity to effectively address the pressing needs.
Our tenure as
a non-permanent seat of the UN Security Council affords us the opportunity to
make a direct contribution to the transformation of global governance and maintenance
of international peace and security.
Under the Charter, the functions and
powers of the Security Council are:
- to maintain international
peace and security in accordance with the principles and purposes of the UN;
investigate any dispute or situation which might lead to international friction;
recommend methods of adjusting such disputes or the terms of settlement;
formulate plans for the establishment of a system to regulate armaments;
determine the existence of a threat to the peace or act of aggression and to recommend
what action should be taken;
- to call on Members to apply economic sanctions
and other measures not involving the use of force to prevent or stop aggression;
take military action against an aggressor;
- to recommend the admission
of new Members;
- to exercise the trusteeship functions of the UN's in "strategic
- to recommend to the General Assembly the appointment of the
Secretary-General and, together with the Assembly, to elect the Judges of the
International Court of Justice.
We are serving in the Security Council
during challenging times in global politics, a time of extraordinary problems
and challenges. The need to improve global governance is therefore paramount.
Extreme poverty, global warming, the protection of basic human rights, and the
resolution of conflicts through effective peacekeeping , the need to protect the
environment, to deal effectively with terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass
destruction - are some of the urgent challenges. Lately, there has been an in
creasing tendency on the part of some powerful and dominant countries to have
determined that the fight against terrorism should be the global agenda's priority.
While South Africa supports the fight against terrorism and proliferation of weapons
of mass destruction, we are concerned at the unilateralist and militarist tendencies
in the name of the global war on terror.
We are also concerned that the
fight against terrorism must not be at the expense of the respect for international
law and the protection of human rights and civil liberties.
As I have indicated,
our approach to the issues on the agenda of the Council, is informed by our own
foreign policy, which is based on a vision of SA, an Africa and a world that is
prosperous, peaceful, democratic, non-racial, non-sexist and united and a world
that is just and equitable.
Sixty percent (60%) of the agenda of the Security
Council regards African conflict and post conflict issues. We will be serving
in the Security Council at a time when it is seized issues which include Western
Sahara, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Cote d'Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Burundi,
Sudan, Somalia and Ethiopia and Eritrea . We see our membership of the Security
Council therefore allowing us to enhance the role that we are already playing
in conflict resolution and peacebuilding on the African continent. In this work
we have been responding to the strong resolve of African leaders, and indeed the
people of Africa, who would like to see our continent achieve peace as a prerequisite
for sustainable development.
We intend to work closely with the AU and
all members of the SC, including the permanent five.
Other major issues
on the SC agenda are the Middle East:
- Palestine - Israel conflict
you will recall, these are some of the key issues we identified in the context
of our second challenge, and are issues that we have been seized with since 1994.
these challenges, the importance of maintaining multilateralism, has never been
so pertinent. The United Nations Security Council cannot work in isolation. Harmonisation
and synergies between Regional Organizations and the United Nations becomes paramount.
The work and contributions of the regional organizations can significantly reinforce
the work of the United Nations. If the Security Council is to make a lasting impact
on the African continent we also believe that we should seek to build synergies
between its work and that of the African Union, in particular its Peace and Security
The reform and expansion of the Security
Council remains one of the key areas that remain outstanding in the reform process.
When the former UN Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, launched the process, he said
and I quote:
. we have come to a fork in the road. This may be
a moment no less decisive than 1945 itself, when the UN was founded. At that time,
a group of far-sighted leaders, led and inspired by Franklin D Roosevelt, were
determined to make the second half of the 20th Century different from the first
half. They saw that the human race had only one world to live in, and that unless
it managed its affairs prudently, all human beings may perish. So they drew up
the rules to govern international behaviour, and founded a network of institutions,
with the UN at its centre, in which the peoples of the world could work together
for the common good. Now we must decide whether it is possible to continue on
the basis agreed then, or whether radical changes are needed ".
we seek to transform the UN, it is also important that we consider the importance
that the drafters of the UN Charter attached in designing a system of checks and
balances, as they gave different powers and functions to its different organs.
Today, however, we see the increasing empowerment of the Security Council at the
expense especially of the General Assembly and other organs. The Security Council
has tended to encroach on the competencies of the other principal organs of the
UN. It has also increasingly assumed for itself a legislative and treaty interpreting
or amending role.
There is no doubt that this approach also weakens multilateralism
in the sense that other organs and bodies can lose their specialised mandates
to the Security Council. For example, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
is the sole and legitimate body for the verification of nuclear safeguards agreements
and its role must not be undermined or subsumed by the Security Council.
is in this context that I want to deal with SA's vote on the UN Security Council
resolution on Myanmar. Let me say at the outset, we are deeply concerned at the
situation in Myanmar. We will continue to call for the release of Aung San Suu
Kyi and all other prisoners and to fight for the restoration of democracy, human
rights and freedom in Myanmar.
The Non-Aligned Countries and the G77 and
China have consistently voiced concern at the tendency of the Security Council
to encroach on the mandate of the other UN's entities. Overall the resolution
contains issues that would be best left to the Human Rights Council. Ironically,
should the Security Council adopt this resolution it would mean that the Human
Rights Council would not be able to address the situation in Myanmar while the
SC remains seized with the matter.
The most fundamental reason why we voted
against this resolution, is that does not fit with the Charter mandate conferred
upon the SC which is to deal with matters that are a threat to regional and international
peace and security.
The Association of South Asian Nations (ASEAN) whom
we consult regularly, have consistently stated that Myanmar is not a threat to
regional or international peace and stability.
This matter would have created
a precedence that will be very difficult to sustain and create challenges for
the UN SC in the long run.
The Myanmar issue indicates that we must interact
more rigorously and timeously with Parliament, with political parties, and with
civili society on all the issues on the agenda of the SC, and the Human Rights
Many people in the world today still
live in abject poverty even at the time when there are enough resources in the
world to eliminate it. Whole societies are not on track to meet the Millennium
Development Goals. Estimates show that at current rates the continent of Africa
will fail to achieve these goals unless urgent action is taken to support the
efforts of African governments towards this end. The UN Secretary General, Mr
Kofi Annan, reminded us recently that globalisation has not been the rising tide
that lifts all boats.
Many people are still denied the basic human rights.
Some live under the constant threat of random acts of terrorism. The proliferation
of small arms and other weapons continues to undermine peace efforts around the
world. There is also concern about the proliferation of nuclear weapons.
therefore need a renewed commitment to the strengthening of a rules-based multilateral
system of global governance based on the democratic ideal. Multilateralism remains
the most effective and efficient system for addressing global problems. In history
no other form of inter-State cooperation has delivered the same results as multilateralism.
Coalitions of the willing on issues that require collective action have also proved
to be short-term solutions that also lack credibility.
South Africa as
part of a group of the majority of countries will continue to strive inside and
outside the Security Council, to ensure that the UN lives up to its name and has
a future as a strong and effective multilateral organisation, enjoying the confidence
of the peoples of the world, and capable of addressing the matters that are of
concern to all humanity. I believe that failure to achieve these objectives will
make our world a very dangerous place indeed.
Despite its weaknesses I believe
that we are better off with the United Nations than we would be without it. But
there are also areas where the United Nations has come short in serving humanity.
are the areas that will need to be addressed if the United Nations is to be stronger
and more relevant at sixty and beyond.
As we reflect on the issue of relevance
of the UN we will need to address the power imbalances within the governance of
the United Nations. When the United Nations was created veto power was given to
the permanent five who were also the victors of the Second World War as well as
the Security Council so that it could preserve international peace and security.
This has been one of the major factors that have defined the nature of the work
that the United Nations does and the way it reacts to crises facing the world.
While the Security Council is mandated by the Charter to act on behalf of
all member states in most cases the special privileges have been used to advance
self-interest. The imbalance in the UN's architecture and power relations that
I have referred to remains one of the central obstacles in its ability to meet
contemporary challenges and the expectations of the peoples of this world.
Therefore the United Nations, especially its Security Council, needs to be
reformed in order that it can be in a position to address a broad range of chaIlenges
that face humanity.
When accepting SA's election to the non-permanent seat
in the UNSC, Minister Zuma said: "we do so conscious and convinced that the
multilateral system of global governance remains the only hope for challenges
facing humanity today.
Kofi Annan, the previous SG of the UN demanded that
we strive for "a world order in which right is might and not might is right".
The fundamental transformation of the UN institutions especially the SC and a
genuine commitment to the ideals of the Charter, is the only way we can respond
to Annan's challenge.
SA within the SC and outside of the Security Council
will endeavour to meet this challenge.
Issued by Department
of Foreign Affairs
Private Bag X152